Posts Tagged ‘debt’

Changes to the Lending Act May Cause Delay for Borrowers

Thursday, August 20th, 2009

The government made some changes to the Landing Act which came into effect in July 2009. These changes will help borrowers to get more information about loan. This Act requires lenders to provide certain disclosures about the mortgage fees. This will give borrowers an idea as how the deal would look like. Now borrowers have more information about their loan choices. But some experts say that this could delay the lending process which is already slow.

The regulations mandate a three-day review period for the loan documents before the loan process can begin in earnest. But the important point is that, if interest rate changes even marginally before the settlement date, a new set of disclosure documents must be given to borrowers, restarting the review process.

Before the law came into practice, lenders could begin the loan-underwriting process on the day they took an application. They could do this by changing borrower’s fees to pay property appraisers. But now, they must wait three days.

When foreclosure crisis came into picture, it was revealed that many borrowers had little idea how much their mortgage could cost them in a given month. So the government felt that there should be some provisions in laws so that a borrower could get enough time to read and grasp the terms of their loan documents. That’s why Congress enacted new laws.

According to the lenders, settling the typical mortgage on a new purchase takes about 45 days — at least two weeks longer than last year, before underwriting rules were severely tightened.

Now, borrowers can lock in interest rates for as long as 60 days, and if they run into trouble, they may extend the “rate lock,” as it is known, for up to three weeks (down from four weeks a year ago). The cost of each further one-week rate-lock extension, however, is one-quarter of a percentage point of the loan size.

If the annual percentage rate on the loan changes by at least an eighth of a percentage point, another mandatory three-day waiting period can be wedged into the latter part of the mortgage process.

Change in the interest rate can be seen by the borrower from the initially quoted rate for many reasons. If their credit score was lower than they first thought, or if they are required to pay mortgage insurance on the loan because their down payment money ran low, for instance, the rate can easily rise by more than one-eighth of a point.

Also, if a borrower’s settlement date is suddenly in jeopardy, he or she can apply for an emergency waiver of the three-day waiting period.

Anderson Chase Financial

Map of Foreclosures and Unemployment

Monday, August 10th, 2009

A recent CNN article provides an interactive map displaying percentages of unemployment and foreclosure across all 50 states. California is evidently hard hit in both unemployment and foreclosure with an 11.6 percent unemployment rate and a 5.21 percent foreclosure rate:

Unemployment

unemployment-map


Foreclosure

foreclosure-map

Here are some additional tidbits and numbers for California, the good and the bad:

• The Obama stimulus bill will create or save an estimated 396,000 jobs in our state alone

• Thirteen banks have failed (highest number after Georgia, with 21 bank failures)

• The banks that failed in California were: Vineyard, Temecula Valley, Metro Pacific, Mirae, First Bank of Beverly Hills, Alliance, County, 1st Centennial, Downey Savings and Loan Association, PFF Bank and Trust, Security Pacific, First Heritage, and IndyMac.

Anderson Chase Financial

Third Largest FHA Lender Suspended

Friday, August 7th, 2009

tbw

Taylor, Bean and Whitaker No Longer Able to Issue FHA Loans

Taylor Bean was known for being less strict than other mortgage lenders. The agency insured mortgages with down payments as low as 3.5 percent, and didn’t have minimum credit-score requirements. “I’ve heard it said it’s good that we have Taylor Bean there because no one else will buy these loans,” said David Lykken, a mortgage expert based out of Austin, Texas. “To say they’re a bottom-feeder may be too strong a statement, but that’s how they’re viewed in a lot of cases.”
On Wednesday, Taylor Bean shut its doors. A press release from TBW reads:

“TAYLOR, BEAN & WHITAKER MORTGAGE CORP. (“TBW”) RECEIVED NOTIFICATION ON AUGUST 4, 2009 FROM THE U.S DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT, FREDDIE MAC AND GINNIE MAE (THE “AGENCIES”) THAT IT WAS BEING TERMINATED AND/OR SUSPENDED AS AN APPROVED SELLER AND/OR SERVICER FOR EACH OF THOSE RESPECTIVE FEDERAL AGENCIES.”

Since then, 2,050 employees have been laid off, and federal authorities have gone in and searched the company, forced it to stop making FHA loans and confirmed that its leaders were under investigation for fraud.

So now what?

• Thousands of borrowers seeking mortgage loans and refinancings in Taylor Bean’s pipeline are suddenly back to square one.

• Cash-strapped borrowers could struggle the most to find a replacement lender offering affordable terms. Taylor Bean was one of the country’s largest FHA (Federal Housing Administration) lenders, trailing only Bank of America and Wells Fargo. It was one of very few handling FHA loans for manufactured homes.

• Hundreds of small banks and brokers that sold their loans to Taylor Bean are suddenly scrambling to find new partners. The removal of a major player could lead to higher prices as well as fewer choices.

• Colonial Bank, a $26 billion Alabama bank with nearly 200 branches in Florida, was relying on Taylor Bean as a lifeline. A planned $300 million infusion of capital from Taylor Bean fizzled last week, raising doubts Colonial will continue.

A word on FHA loans. The Federal Housing Administration does not MAKE the loans, but rather, insures them from private lenders. FHA loans are largely issued to financially-strapped or first-time homebuyers due to their low down payments and initial interest rates. TBW subsisted on insuring such loans; to be suspended from doing FHA loans essentially shut down the business.

Anderson Chase Financial

Fannie and Freddie and Mortgage Overhaul

Thursday, August 6th, 2009

The Obama administration is considering an overhaul of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac that would strip the mortgage finance giants of hundreds of billions of dollars in troubled loans and create a new structure to support the home-loan market. The bad debts the firms own would be placed in new government financial institutions – so-called “bad banks” – that would take responsibility for collecting as much of the outstanding balance as possible. What would be left would be two healthy financial companies with a clean slate.

The moves would represent one of the most dramatic reorderings of the badly shattered housing finance system since Fannie Mae was created by Congress to support mortgage lending during the Great Depression. Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac have government charters to buy home loans from banks, which they repackage and sell to investors. The banks can then use the proceeds to offer more loans to home buyers.

The proposal, which is preliminary and one of several under discussion, is scheduled to be taken up today by the White House’s National Economic Council. The government’s efforts so far “have taken the risk out of those two firms,” Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner said. “The only question that remains is what form, what structure they ultimately will take.”

In an interview yesterday announcing that he would step down this month, James Lockhart, the chief regulator of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, said there needs to be a “good bank, bad bank” structure.

bank

Good Bank, Bad Bank

The “bad bank” would be a depository for Fannie Mae’s and Freddie Mac’s bad assets. Then, the government could create new companies, if it chose to do so, that would attract private investment in support of mortgage finance. Options for the “good banks” include consolidating the firms into a single government agency, leaving mortgage finance purely to private banks or maintaining a hybrid model.

A major problem has been that Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac own and insure trillions of dollars of existing mortgages. With the economy still in a deep recession, joblessness rising and defaults on home loans expected to continue to increase, there is great uncertainty over the size of future losses at Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. That, in turn, is likely to drive investors from committing money to the companies.

Anderson Chase Financial

Lenders Gain Money For Your Delinquency

Wednesday, August 5th, 2009

In a recent blog, we discussed two reasons why lenders may be reluctant to modify delinquent loans, those reasons being 1) 30 percent of delinquent borrowers just need time – if a bank modifies those loans, they’ll end up losing money on a homeowner who would’ve worked things out on their own eventually, and 2) risk of redefault.

It appears that lenders have other reasons for not modifying your loan, even with the Obama loan initiative, which rewards lenders $1000 for each modified loan and $1000 a year for the next three years. When borrowers stop paying, banks collect fees out of the proceeds when the homes are sold in foreclosure, and the longer a homeowner is late on payments, the more opportunity the lender has to accumulate revenue: fees for insurance, appraisals, title searches, legal services, etc. Legal experts say that the potential for lenders to collect extra fees from their borrowers’ delinquency are pretty significant – Obama’s incentives may pale in comparison. Extra icing for delinquency and then more for foreclosure? And even more depending on the length of delinquency? Why WOULDN’T that whet the appetite of an unscrupulous mortgage company?

Our advice to you is to find solid representation that will plead your case before your lender. Every lender is confronted by hundreds, if not thousands, of aggrieved borrowers and homeowners desperate to save their homes. Having professional, legal representation will not only put more pressure on the lender to modify your loan but also give your case more clout.

Anderson Chase Financial