Posts Tagged ‘foreclosure’

Fannie and Freddie and Mortgage Overhaul

Thursday, August 6th, 2009

The Obama administration is considering an overhaul of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac that would strip the mortgage finance giants of hundreds of billions of dollars in troubled loans and create a new structure to support the home-loan market. The bad debts the firms own would be placed in new government financial institutions – so-called “bad banks” – that would take responsibility for collecting as much of the outstanding balance as possible. What would be left would be two healthy financial companies with a clean slate.

The moves would represent one of the most dramatic reorderings of the badly shattered housing finance system since Fannie Mae was created by Congress to support mortgage lending during the Great Depression. Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac have government charters to buy home loans from banks, which they repackage and sell to investors. The banks can then use the proceeds to offer more loans to home buyers.

The proposal, which is preliminary and one of several under discussion, is scheduled to be taken up today by the White House’s National Economic Council. The government’s efforts so far “have taken the risk out of those two firms,” Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner said. “The only question that remains is what form, what structure they ultimately will take.”

In an interview yesterday announcing that he would step down this month, James Lockhart, the chief regulator of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, said there needs to be a “good bank, bad bank” structure.

bank

Good Bank, Bad Bank

The “bad bank” would be a depository for Fannie Mae’s and Freddie Mac’s bad assets. Then, the government could create new companies, if it chose to do so, that would attract private investment in support of mortgage finance. Options for the “good banks” include consolidating the firms into a single government agency, leaving mortgage finance purely to private banks or maintaining a hybrid model.

A major problem has been that Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac own and insure trillions of dollars of existing mortgages. With the economy still in a deep recession, joblessness rising and defaults on home loans expected to continue to increase, there is great uncertainty over the size of future losses at Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. That, in turn, is likely to drive investors from committing money to the companies.

Anderson Chase Financial

Outlook on Real Estate Recovery

Friday, July 31st, 2009

In a recent survey by LoopNet Pulse Poll of commercial real estate and investment professionals, the outlook seems grim for the real estate market. While many have predicted significant recovery in the housing sector by the end of 2009, it seems that most experts aren’t so sure. In fact, only about 10 percent of the real estate and investment professionals surveyed believe that recovery can be expected in 2009. Back in May, 33 percent thought that we could expect recovery in 2009. It seems that hope is waning.

So when CAN we expect the housing market to recover? Over 30 percent of real estate experts – a 5 percent increase from May – believe that to be in 2011. But the majority of those polled, 56 percent (up from 42 percent in May), expect recovery to come next year.

Among other survey findings:

* The majority of respondents expect prices to fall further, within 11 to 20 percent, while 20 percent expect declines of 20 percent or more.
* Among owners, 28 percent think pricing in commercial real estate has bottomed and will decline by 5 percent or less. Nearly 20 percent of investors believe that too.
* Eighteen percent of brokers surveyed expect up to 5 percent declines in prices and 19 percent predicted declines of 20 percent or more.
* Sixty percent expect prices to hit its lowest level between fourth quarter 2009 and third quarter 2010.
* The majority agreed multifamily offers the best long-term investment opportunity in the current cycle.

If you’re considering a loan modification, the best time to send in a proposal to your lender and get an approval would be now. If you wait too long, the chances that you will lose your home will only grow. Gather all important documents together, generate a financial plan for the remainder of 2009 with a target mortgage payment program and ideas of ways to further cut costs, and contact your lender.

Best of luck, from Anderson Chase Financial.

Anderson Chase Financial

Homeowners – Are You Underwater?

Thursday, July 30th, 2009

What does it mean to be “underwater” or “upside down”? When a property is underwater, it means that the homeowner owes more than the property is worth. People who bought their homes in 2006, the peak of the housing bubble when prices were highest, are now left with property that is impossible to sell.

bubble

Now the government is redressing its Home Affordable Refinance Program to help out homeowners who have not been delinquent in payments but are upside down and dealing with negative amortization. Lenders can now offer new mortgages to borrowers if the property value is up to 25 percent greater than the mortgage amount. It used to be that lenders could only refinance loans for borrowers whose mortgage was no more than 5 percent greater than the home’s value. However, considering the significant drop in real estate prices, 5 percent wasn’t going to cut it for many homeowners.

You may be wondering, “Don’t we have bigger issues to deal with? Like homeowners who’ve already MISSED payments?” And yes, the government has been trying to mend this issue with various initiatives which have helped to varying degrees, and many loan modification agencies – ones that breed integrity and customer value – are serving consumers for this purpose. But we want to not only remedy the present but also stem future waves of foreclosures.

Many borrowers who AREN’T late on payments are still stuck with mortgages characterized by high interest rates or the potential to adjust beyond the homeowner’s means in coming years. To make matters worse, lenders and mortgage insurers have tightened underwriting rules, typically requiring borrowers to have at least 15 percent equity in a home.

There is some fine print in this new refinancing program. Borrowers must hold a loan that was purchased by Freddie Mac or Fannie Mae, the government-controlled companies that buy most mortgages. To determine whether you have a Fannie or Freddie loan, go to the “loan lookup” tab at www.MakingHomeAffordable.gov.

If you qualify, your interest rate will very likely be slightly higher than the market’s best loan rates, especially if you refinance with someone other than your current servicer. And if you are 5 to 25 percent underwater with a Fannie Mae loan, you must refinance with your current servicer to qualify.

No matter what your current mortgage situation, there is help available. You just need to know where to look and who to consult. Even if it may not seem like your situation is particularly pressing, there are steps that can be taken now to alleviate potential problems in the future.

Anderson Chase Financial

Why Lenders May Be Reluctant to Modify

Monday, July 27th, 2009

When you consider the effects of a loan modification, it looks like a win-win-win situation. The homeowner benefits because with a loan modification, they are able to make their lowered monthly mortgage payments and keep their home, the lenders save the huge cost of repossessing and reselling a foreclosed property, and neighborhoods avoid the negative effects on real estate values in the community. This is the reason why the Bush administration launched an effort to encourage loan modifications, and the reason why the Obama administration greatly expanded on it. However, we are still faced with the fact that of the initially estimated 4 million households that would benefit from Obama’s loan modification initiative, only 350,000 borrowers have even been offered new loans. On the other hand, 1,155,299 properties faced new foreclosure filings between March and June.

Why are lenders not offering more modifications? Why have so few modifications gone into effect?

There are two reasons lenders may be reluctant to modify a loan:

1) A Minority of Homeowners Just Need Time – Not Help
Approximately 30% of troubled debtors eventually can pay off a mortgage without a modification. Therefore, for lenders, 30% of the total cost of modifying loans is wasted. Since lenders don’t know beforehand if a particular homeowner falls into the percentage who will eventually make it out without a modification, they are more reluctant to grant modifications overall.

2) A Loan Modification May Not Be a Permanent Solution
The second problem is the risk that many borrowers redefault on a modified loan. By the time that happens, the value of the house has declined further, and foreclosure costs the lender even more than it would have earlier. The HAMP program includes $10 billion for partial protection against that risk, but it may not be enough, especially given the sour outlook for employment.
If you are looking for a loan modification, you need to be serious about committing to change. Do not view loan modifications as an “easy way out” or a temporary relief. A successful loan modification with lasting effects will require you to take charge of your finances and be diligent about making your payments. A loan modification should not be the beginning of another cycle. It should be the beginning of a new path.

forest-path1

Why Foreclosures are Still Rising

Thursday, July 23rd, 2009

Obama’s sweeping loan modification initiative has been in place for five months. Incentives are being offered to lenders who agree to loan modification proposals. It appears that different projects, proposals, and processes are in place that would have technically resulted in fewer foreclosures by now. Instead, foreclosure filings were reported on more than 1.5 million properties in the first six months of the year, a 15% increase over the same period last year. So why are foreclosures still rising?

Here are six factors that may account for why foreclosures are still growing:

1. Unemployment
Recently, the unemployment rate hit 9.5%. According to Celia Chen, an economist at Moody’s Economy.com, the key factor of the growing unemployment rate is the rise of home foreclosures. “Employers continue to shed jobs, and that makes it difficult for even people with good credit who were doing fine to keep up with their mortgage payment,” Chen says. For example, a recent report issued by federal bank regulators found that home loans to borrowers with solid credit histories were going bad at a rapid clip. “Prime loans, which represented two thirds of all mortgages in the portfolio, experienced the highest percentage increase in serious delinquencies, climbing by more than 20% from the prior quarter to 2.9% of prime mortgages,” the report stated.

2. Plunging home values
Almost three years since the real estate bubble burst, home prices continue the painful decline. Although the pace of decline leveled out slightly compared to the previous month, home prices in 20 major metro areas dropped 18.1% in April from a year earlier. Falling home values have dragged more than 20% of American homeowners “underwater”—meaning they owe more on their mortgages than the property is worth—as of the first quarter. By sucking equity out of homes, the price declines have also evaporated much of a homeowner’s financial incentive for paying their mortgage bill, Chen says. “When somebody doesn’t have equity in their house and they are struggling to pay their mortgage, the likelihood of a foreclosure is much higher,” she says. In addition, home owners with less equity in their homes will have a more difficult time refinancing their mortgage.

3. End of foreclosure moratoriums
The end of certain foreclosure moratoriums—including those of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, which were lifted in late March—also contributed to the rise in foreclosures during the period, Chen says.

4. Is Obama’s plan working?
A key factor of Obama’s housing rescue plan is an effort to restructure—or modify—as many as 4 million troubled loans. So far, about 325,000 modification offers have been made through the program, according to Bloomberg news. Chen says the program is having an impact for certain individual borrowers, but the efforts—at least so far—have not put much of a dent into the national foreclosure epidemic. “The program is making progress. It’s just that there are a large number of distressed borrowers out there,” she says. “It’s so hard to process all of those loans, and then second of all, not all of those borrowers will qualify for the program.” Borrowers have complained of long delays and bureaucratic hurdles in their efforts to modify their mortgages.

Though the administration’s effort includes incentive payments to convince servicers to modify the loans, Newport says some may find it less costly to foreclose on the property. “My understanding is that there is going to be some pressure from the administration to get banks to start renegotiating more loans,” he says. “But if [modification is] not in [the servicer's] self-interest, I don’t think that they are going to do much.”

5. Mounting political pressure
Mortgage services appear to be facing mounting pressure from Washington to redouble their efforts. “We believe there is a general need for servicers to devote substantially more resources to this program for it to fully succeed and achieve the objectives we all share,” Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner and HUD chief Shaun Donovan said in a recent letter to 25 mortgage servicing firms. In a hearing today, Senate Banking Committee Chairman Christopher Dodd, a Democrat from Connecticut, expressed his frustration more directly. “Why am I still reading about lost files, understaffed and undertrained servicers, and hours spent on hold on the phone?” Dodd said in a prepared opening statement. “Why are servicers and lenders refusing to accept principal reduction so that homeowners can start building equity and get the housing market moving again?”

6. Foreclosure outlook
Despite this pressure, Newport expects foreclosure rates to rise into next year. “It’s going to keep on getting worse until the unemployment rate peaks, which we think will happen in about the middle of next year,” he says. For her part, Chen argues that a successful mortgage rescue program could expedite a housing recovery. “The hope is that we will be able to push through enough mortgage modifications to prevent home prices from falling too much more,” she said.